webs

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Review. Show all posts

Friday, 20 September 2013

Movie Review - Lee Daniels' The Butler

Posted on 07:38 by Unknown

Director: Lee Daniels
Starring: Forest Whitaker, Oprah Winfrey, David Oyelowo
Year: 2013

I have a problem with directors putting their names before a movie's title.  Right or wrong, I immediately think I have an idea what that director might be like, and it's not positive.  It shows a certain arrogance and conceit to claim a movie as your own in such blatant ways, even if you were the primary mind behind the film.  Now, Lee Daniels himself supposedly didn't like the idea, but had to do it because the original title was already taken.  So maybe he was "forced" into doing it, coerced into giving himself more credit than usual.  But regardless, to me the harm was already done.  That famed fourth wall was already damaged by pushing the director's name at me, by reminding me that this isn't reality, that it's a film made by people to try to make me feel a certain way.  Well, if that's the direction you're going you had better go all the way, and surprisingly that's exactly what they did.

The title character of the film is, yes, a butler; an African-American man originally from the deep South named Cecil Gaines.  As a child in the 1920s living on a cotton plantation, Cecil would get an early & first hand account of the brutal treatment of the black workers by their white bosses.  His father dead and his mother driven to madness, Cecil slowly moved north in search of food, work, and freedom from hostility.  He would eventually find work as a butler, even landing the coveted job as a member of the White House staff in Washington D.C.  There, Cecil and his family lived in peace while the years, and the Presidents, rolled on by.  But although the North was a relatively progressive place to live, the South was still mired in racism, violence, and oppression.  And when Louis Gaines, Cecil's son, sets out to make a difference, to change the world, the peace of the family is shattered and the vigilant butler must watch the country around him change; leader by leader, law by law, and death by death.


When I say they went all the way & just destroyed the fourth wall, I mean exactly that.  There was no pretense about it; every chance the film had we were reminded that these were actors, not real people in real events.  That might sound a little silly, because of course they're actors, but most movies go to great lengths to hide that fact from us.  But not this one.  At every turn there was another semi-ridiculous cameo: Mariah Carey as Cecil's mom, Lenny Kravitz as his co-worker, Robin Williams as Eisenhower, John Cusack as Nixon.  The list goes on and on and there was absolutely no shame in the amount of famous faces paraded across the screen.  But the thing is, it worked.  Not once did anyone in the movie fake a performance or try to "become" the character.  These were storytellers in an epic tale of American life.  Actors, yes, but re-enactors more than anything else.  History was related to us in fine detail through the eyes of a real life butler played on screen by another man, in a movie created by a director on manufactured sets, in a time that is starting to forget that the privileges we have today didn't always exist.

I bought in to the story, which happens to be true, because I didn't feel mislead in any way.  I liked the style the movie was done in, much better than other historical dramas; like Lincoln, which I liked just fine but found to be so over-dramatic that it became oppressive and dull.  This one was more like Forrest Gump, with its simple narration, quick timeline, and occasional humor.  It wasn't as good as that film, but it was still an interesting look at a fascinating time.  Now unlike Forrest Gump, the acting in The Butler didn't elevate it beyond what the story had to offer.  Forest Whitaker was fine as Cecil Gaines, a great vehicle for the movie.  Oprah as his wife Gloria was a little over-the-top and often forced.  The various actors who played the revolving Presidents were all fine, if a little forgettable.  And that could be said about the movie itself; the way the film was delivered was refreshingly clean, the acting was good all around, but by the end I was left feeling underwhelmed.  I liked the story, I liked the characters, but about half way through I got the point and the rest of the movie felt a little like history class.  For a film that is getting Oscar buzz, there's not too much that's going to make you jump out of your seat.  It was good, not great, not extremely memorable, but it is definitely worth your time and worth watching.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ 

Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Movie Review - To Rome with Love

Posted on 08:22 by Unknown

Director: Woody Allen
Starring: Woody Allen, Alec Baldwin, Jess Eisenberg 
Ellen Page, Penelope Cruz, Roberto Benigni
Year: 2012

I love Woody Allen movies.  I'd have to say that he's in my Top 5 favorite directors.  His style of neurotic comedy gets me every time.  And the way he can paint a portrait of a city is amazing.  You can tell how much he loves New York, especially in Manhattan, which I think is his best work.  But you can also see his talent for capturing other cities in a movie like Midnight in Paris, a film that I really didn't like.  It was too fantastic, too weak, and it left me feeling disappointed.  I had hopes that To Rome with Love would be more like the former and less like that latter.

Various non-connected stories are occurring at the same time in Rome in this movie, all pertaining to love, relationships, aging, and life in general.  A retired opera director stumbles upon a talented but shy singer when his daughter falls in love with an Italian.  A young architect meets his inspiration and then meets the crazy girl of his dreams.  A newly married couple go on separate adventures on their honeymoon where temptations abound.  A normal man finds his life turned upside down by sudden fame.  These stories showcase life is Rome, a vibrant and beautiful city where love happens suddenly and heartbreak follows just as quickly.

Woody Allen has a great eye, and he shows that here by creating a wonderful backdrop for his film.  The city and the country are both excellently displayed and you immediately long to go there.  But that was, unfortunately, the best part of the movie.  There was a strange and unbelievable quality to the story that I found hard to accept.  It had a lot to say about fantasies, dreams, hopes, regrets, but that's not what I wanted.  I wanted a wonderful Woody Allen movie; I didn't want Midnight in Paris 2.  That said, there was nothing horrible about the film; the acting was fine, the pace was quick, the music was nice.  But I found myself dissatisfied at the end, wanting Manhattan or Annie Hall, not Match Point or Scoop.  Now, maybe this one wasn't as bad as those, but I guess it was somewhere in the middle, in no-man's-land between great and awful.  But that's not where you want to be.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Tuesday, 17 September 2013

Movie Review - Inglourious Basterds

Posted on 08:51 by Unknown

Director: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: Christoph Waltz, Brad Pitt, Melanie Laurent
Michael Fassbender, Diane Kruger, Eli Roth
Year: 2009

I, like most of you, have seen a ton of Tarantino movies.  You can't talk about one of his films without talking about other ones because they all have a similar style.  I'm not saying that they're all the same, far from it, but you can definitely tell a Tarantino movie when you see one.  He just has a way of bringing bloody humor & intense action to a story that's just so original and well-orchestrated.  Even if you don't love his work, you've got to admit that he's a force and someone who has put his stamp on cinema.  So going into Inglourious Basterds I'm automatically thinking about the other ones that I've seen.  The crime genre (Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown), the revenge plots (Kill Bill, Django Unchained).  All good movies, some even great, but none as excellent this film, the best Quentin Tarantino film that I have seen.

The story is set during WWII in France, where the Nazis have complete control.  We begin to meet the cast of characters, a group that will eventually come together and affect each others' lives.  Hans Landa, the Jew Hunter, a German officer in charge of finding hidden secrets.  Aldo Raine, the leader of the Bastards, a group of American soldiers whos mission is to kill Nazis.  Shosanna, a Jewish girl who barely survived her family's murder, now the owner of a French theatre.  Archie Hicox, a German-speaking Brit who is going undercover.  And Bridget von Hammersmark, a German actress who is also a double-crossing spy.  These characters are each influencing the war in their own way, and will meet at a movie premiere where plot after devious plot is revealed, sprung, dismantled, and abandoned, as the climax draws near and the history of Europe is decided.

As with other Tarantino films, there are certain things you can expect.  A ton of blood, a good bit of quirky humor, and some long uncomfortable scenes that feel a little too real.  Inglourious Basterds does not disappoint, as it delivers everything you want from this director and leaves you cinematically satisfied.  However, what makes it the best Tarantino film of them all is the era.  It's not so much better than all his other movies, but the time period lends itself perfectly to the style of his movies.  Here is a time in which bloody murders were commonplace.  Here is a time where revenge, subterfuge, and stupidity ran rampant and order disintegrated.  Here is one of the most influential times in world history, and it seems like it was made to be shown to us in a Tarantino way.

And that's not even the best part.  The key to this being such an amazing film is Christoph Waltz.  I saw him in Django before I saw him in Basterds and I thought he was really good in that.  But wow was he amazing in this.  He was the perfect villain; utterly detestable but oddly likeable.  No one could have played the part of the crafty killer better than he did; he was the Jew Hunter, he made me believe that he literally took pleasure in orchestrating the murder of these people, all while being funny, witty, and extremely polite.  The other actors in the film were strong as well; Brad Pitt as the comical American, Melanie Laurent as the escaped Jew, Michael Fassbender as the pompous Englishman.  None of them compared to Waltz, who stole the show, but they all helped to solidify an incredible film that showcased Tarantino's talent like nothing has ever done before.  You've got to like his style, and you've pretty much got to like WWII, but if you do than you've got to see this movie.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Monday, 16 September 2013

Movie Review - Into the White

Posted on 08:23 by Unknown

Director: Petter Naess
Starring: Lachlan Nieboer, Florian Lukas, Rupert Grint
Year: 2012

Into the White is a film out of Norway.  Have you seen a lot of those, films out of Norway?  Me neither.  But I was intrigued by this one.  First, there are three languages spoken in the movie: English, German, and Norwegian.  That was interesting all by itself; culture clash in the snow.  Secondly, I love WWII movies, even though this one isn't the kind that we're used to.  And lastly, I don't know the two main actors, but someone was very smart when they added in Rupert Grint (Harry Potter) and David Kross (The Reader).  Those are movies that I've seen and helped catch my attention.  So, on we go, let's see how they make movies in Norway.

Set during World War II, the story begins high in the frigid Norwegian mountains.  British & German pilots fly over this territory frequently, vying for control of what could be a highly productive source of raw materials that could tip the scales of war.  When a German plane is shot down, the surviving soldiers must quickly find shelter or die.  They soon find a snug hunting cabin, settle in to resupply, and make plans for rejoining their army.  But trouble arrives in the form of two English airmen, also shot down in the same dogfight.  The armed Germans immediately take the Brits captive, declaring them prisoners of war.  The two groups instantly hate each other, but soon find that not only do they have much in common, but that they are going to need each other in order to survive.

Looking back, the plot sounds a little silly; enemies meeting in a hostile environment, forced to work together, and learning lessons.  Why can't we all just get along!?  But while watching the film it didn't feel exactly like that.  The plot was actually based on a true story.  So it might seem a little coincidental, but it happened, and the "lessons learned" might have happened too.  After all, soldiers aren't robots, they're human, and when you're forced to accept that your enemies are humans too perhaps you begin to see things differently.  I don't know, I've never been trapped in a cabin with someone I hated.  Putting the story aside, the rest of the movie was just OK.  The acting was suspect, the bonds formed were a little cheesy, and there really wasn't much action for an action movie.  In the end, the film became about humanity, harsh elements, adaptability, friendship.  And although it wasn't perfect, I found myself really enjoying it.  I would recommend it to anyone who likes POW camp movies, WWII, survival films, that kind of thing.  To the rest of you, you might want to just let this one go; you're not missing too much.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Saturday, 14 September 2013

Movie Review - We're the Millers

Posted on 08:11 by Unknown

Director: Rawson Marshall Thurber
Starring: Jason Sudeikis, Jennifer Aniston, Ed Helms
Year: 2013

I absolutely did not expect to like this movie, for many many reasons.  The first would have to be that I don't really like comedies.  Of course there are movies that I find funny, but as a genre comedies are something I stay away from.  They're usually just so stupid, with bad acting & ridiculous plots.  And the comedians themselves are usually so unlikeable, so off-putting.  I don't have a defined opinion on Jason Sudeikis I guess; he's good as Joe Biden on SNL, which I guess is something.  Jennifer Aniston I attribute to Friends, as I'm sure 99% of you do.  She's not a bad actress on that show, but she has definitely been bad in a variety of horrible movies.  So going in I was sure I wouldn't like this movie, a throw-away comedy about drugs, strippers, polo shirts, and RVs.  Well, apparently the humor in We're the Millers struck me in just the right way, because I did like it, I did laugh, and I did not find it to be as awful as I had imagined.

David is a drug dealer.  He has the same job he had in college, selling pot, and that's about all he does.  He makes a good living and is saving up quite a bankroll, that is until the day he is robbed, not only of his own money but of all the money he owes his supplier.  Now he's got to pull off a dangerous job in order to cancel the debt; head to Mexico & cross back over the border with a shipment hidden away in an RV.  Only problem is, he knows he'll be searched & found out by the border guards.  What he needs is a disguise, and what better disguise then a family of four.  So he recruits the least likely team possible; a stripper, a dork, and a bum.  Transforming themselves into your average every day family, the "Millers" try to pull off an almost impossible mission; pretending that they are normal.


It was just so much better than I thought it would be.  The humor was a lot less dumb and a lot more raunchy than expected.  I mean, I expected some.  After all, the previews show the now-famous Jennifer Aniston strip scene, and the part where a boy's testicle is bitten by a spider.  So I guess I knew that some dirty comedy was coming, but I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of cussing, penis jokes, and general mockery in the film.  Now, that said, those same tactics can come off as extremely stupid in the wrong movie, in front of the wrong audience, or when they're poorly executed.  But for some reason it hit me as just the right amount of raunchy done in just the right way.  Maybe it was because they were pretending to be a straight laced family.  If they have been a straight laced family who found themselves in this strange predicament and for some reason kept making dirty jokes, I don't think I would have laughed as much.  It seems a simple trick, but because they were acting normal while acting abnormal the humor came across loud & clear.

It wasn't all wonderful.  Somehow Jason Sudeikis came off as the straight man, while everyone around him was going wild.  He could have been much funnier, or maybe another actor in his place would have been funnier.  It was hard to divorce my memories of Rachel from Aniston's character most of the time, with only one great scene around the campfire showcasing her humor.  The rest of the time she was just a fill in.  Ed Helms as the drug-overlord was completely throw-away, a really annoying character badly acted, and I usually love him.  As I said I bought in to the style of comedy, but I could easily see how 30% of people would find it horribly offensive while another 30% would find it juvenile.  I can't say it was the greatest comedy of all time, but it did surprise me and that's always worth a few points.  Perhaps the best parts were the small ones; Kenny "Miller" (the virgin), Don Fitzgerald (the mustachioed Narc), and Scottie P. (Namsayin'?).  All in all We're the Millers was a good comedy that packed a little more punch than advertised.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰

Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Friday, 13 September 2013

Movie Review - Piranha

Posted on 07:35 by Unknown

Director: Joe Dante
Starring: Bradford Dillman, Heather Menzies, Kevin McCarthy
Year: 1978

You know how I love a good b-movie.  There have been so many versions of this movie made that I had to see the original.  There was the made-for-TV version with Mila Kunis and Soleil Moon Frye, the sequel, the remake with Elizabeth Shue.  That's a lot of movies about such an improbable subject.  So I watched the first one because I figured it was my duty, and I realized I had seen it before.  That doesn't happen to me very often, forgetting that I had seen a film.  Maybe I watched it late at night as a kid or something, probably when I wasn't supposed to.  I was negative five when it came out, so I'm really not sure, but a ton seemed familiar as I watched it.  Anyway, it was nice to be reacquainted.

Apparently the military likes to keep abandoned genetic warfare plants hidden deep in the woods with most of their experiments still alive and under-supervised.  And when two young hikers go missing, the two unlikely companions that begin searching for them stumble across the site & accidentally release an unknown danger into the local waters.  A new strain of piranha is now on the loose, one that can live in fresh or salt water, cold or warm climates, eating & breeding their way to total dominance.  The people of the area are in trouble, and only the pair that accidentally set the plague free can stop it in time.

Wonderfully bad in every way; a great b-movie.  From the teens deciding to go skinny dipping in a barbwire-surrounded death tank to the hundreds of people having their legs bitten off by a million razor teeth, Piranha was everything I had hoped it would be.  And pieces kept coming back to me, so it felt like a visit with an old forgotten friend.  There was a lot to like about this movie; the over-acted dramatic dialogue, the bloody remains of fish food, the random boob exposure.  Of course, it was all utterly ridiculous, but that's what makes a b-movie great.  You can't take yourself seriously and be a good bad movie, you've got to be able to laugh at yourself.  It wasn't the best I've seen, but it definitely deserves cult classic status and ought to be enjoyed by fans of this genre.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Monday, 9 September 2013

Movie Review - Ip Man

Posted on 07:57 by Unknown

Director: Wilson Yip
Starring: Donnie Yen, Lynn Hung, Siu-Wong Fan
Year: 2008

I don't often watch kung fu movies, or any martial arts movies for that matter.  I've seen some Jackie Chan and Jet Li films before, but that's about the extent of it.  I'm not even sure if I've ever seen a Bruce Lee movie before.  But Ip Man was recommended to me and I thought I'd give it a shot.  This is a mostly true story, and incidentally Ip Man trained Bruce Lee, teaching him the art of Wing Chun kung fu.  So a biography set in an interesting time about a cool subject.  I figured it would be good if not great, and that's exactly what it was; a film that was perfect at being one thing, even if that one thing isn't necessarily my thing.

Ip Man was a master in the art of kung fu.  Living in China in a province known for its martial arts, he was renowned for his knowledge, though he didn't teach his style to others.  Challenged by students as well as masters, Ip Man remained partially aloof and uninvolved in the constant battle for dominance in the field.  All this would change during the War, when Japan invaded China and their culture was shattered.  Known as a great fighter, Ip Man was challenged continually by the occupying Japanese general, while all he wanted was a good life for his family and peace for his friends.  In a final confrontation, the best martial artist from China goes up against the best from Japan in a clash of countries that will inspire a nation.

The movie was pretty much what I had expected.  It was a kung fu movie, with a ton of fight scenes, rapid punches, flips, kicks, tricks, a little humor, and ultimately a message delivered through an art form.  I enjoyed it for what it was, and I was glad it wasn't as fantastic as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon or others in that genre.  It turned out to be pretty realistic, interesting, and entertaining.  That said, it's still not my thing.  The acting and characters are not really the focal point in movies like this, and tend to be sub-par.  You have to look past that in order to enjoy the film, and that's fine, but then sometimes you're forced to remember that the lead is a great athlete, not a great actor.  Ip Man was a well-made kung fu movie, so if that's your thing I doubt you'll be disappointed.  If you're like me though, it's still a cool film, just not something you'll fall in love with.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Movie Review - Atlantis: The Lost Empire

Posted on 12:17 by Unknown

Director: Gary Trousdale
Starring: Michael J. Fox, Cree Summer, James Garner
Year: 2001

So I've talked about the Disney movies that I missed because I was getting a little too old for them.  But there's a group that everyone missed because they didn't look very good.  Treasure Planet was one, and Atlantis is another.  They aren't "Disney movies" in the sense that we have come to generalize.  They don't have the patented princess, they don't have original songs, and they're too action packed.  It's not really fair, but we judge them against The Lion King and find them lacking.  I'm not sure what demographic these movies are pointed towards; ten-year-old boys maybe.  But a lot of people let them go unwatched when they came out, and even if they have some redeeming qualities, there's a reason why they weren't popular.

We've all heard the stories of the legendary lost city of Atlantis.  Supposedly it was a great nation, technologically advanced, that was swept under the sea by some cataclysmic event.  Well, Milo Thatch is determined to find it.  He desperately seeks aid in finding the ancient land, only to discover that a team of experts has already been formed and prepared to find it.  Milo joins the crew as the linguist, but he's in over his head, and he doesn't know exactly what is going on.  The explorers find the lost land, but it's not uninhabited, it's populated by a people who have forgotten their once proud past.  Milo must uncover the secrets of Atlantis to make the expedition a success and to save the land.

Meh.  It was alright, but I'm just not that excited about it.  I guess that's the reason no one really saw it when it came out and why it's not respected as a great Disney movie.  It had some good parts; Fox was good as Milo, the bumbling scholar.  Garner was good as Rourke, the hardened veteran.  But the movie was a little messy.  Nothing made perfect sense, and if I was often confused I wonder what a kid would think.  There were even subtitles.  I mean, that's a cool way to introduce children to foreign films, but was it really necessary?  There was a lot of action, some fire fights, and strange robots that didn't really fit into the story.  And it wasn't a musical, so the songs couldn't cover up the flaws.  I enjoyed it somewhat; it wasn't any worse than most action movies.  But I missed the Disney elements that I have come to love, and I was left entertained but disappointed.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Movie Review - Mulan

Posted on 09:28 by Unknown

Director: Barry Cook
Starring: Ming-Na Wen, Eddie Murphy, BD Wong
Year: 1998

This is one of those Disney movies that I missed when it first came out, like Hercules or Pocahontas.  Or maybe I was just getting a little too old to watch Disney movies anymore.  Whatever the reason, I'm just old enough to enjoy watching them again; I guess having a four-year-old daughter doesn't hurt.  But I'm glad to go back and catch up on the classic animated movies that I missed.  Some of them are just alright, but others are surprisingly good.  Mulan is one of the latter, a movie that I knew by the music but never imagined it would be as fun to watch as it ended up being.

The story of Mulan starts with the invasion of China.  The Huns have crossed the Great Wall and in so doing have started a war.  One man from every household has been called to arms to defend his country.  In the Fa family, the only man is the pater familias, but he is old, injured, and sure to die.  So his daughter Mulan takes his place.  She has never been graceful or a good match, but she is brave, intelligent, and forms a plan that will allow her to serve where only men can; to don her father's armor and pretend to be a boy.  Mulan must train hard and learn fast to become a soldier and help the Imperial Army defeat the dreaded Huns.  There to help are a lucky cricket, her trusted horse, and a tiny dragon who was once a Fa family guardian.  The team must work together to keep Mulan's secret and save China.

The story was actually kind of cool.  It's not something you see in Disney movies very often, it was more of a plot from an actual movie.  And that's what struck me; that this could be a real film.  They would have needed different actors though.  I know voice-over people are a whole other breed, but some of the characters were painfully done.  Mulan in particular was very badly acted.  I didn't actually mind Eddie Murphy as Mushu the dragon; he was silly but acceptably so.  The music was what made the movie though.  We all know Christiana Aguilera's version of 'Reflection', but the version in the film was much better.  And other songs like 'I'll Make a Man Out of You', 'Honor to Us All', and 'A Girl Worth Fighting For' were all very strong, catchy, and appropriate.  Mulan was a solid movie with a good story, nice music, and a little bit of kiddy comedy that was all blended together quite nicely to make an enjoyable experience.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Movie Review - A Dangerous Method

Posted on 08:22 by Unknown

Director: David Cronenberg
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Viggo Mortensen, Keira Knightley, Vincent Cassel
Year: 2011

I never really knew much about Michael Fassbender, but he's quickly becoming one of my new favorite actors.  With early roles in 300 and Hunger, and then Inglourious Basterds and Prometheus, he's showed some good range and a knack for being believable.  He must be popular right now, because he's soon to be in 12 Years a Slave and The Counselor.  Anyway, he's a good actor and I was excited to see him play someone as interesting as Carl Jung.  Viggo Mortensen and Keira Knightley I'm not so in love with, not to say that they're bad actors.  But it was Fassbender I wanted to be featured in this film; he was and he did an amazing job.

This is a true story, a look at the life of psychotherapist Carl Jung; his methods, his mistresses, his mentor.  Jung was a follower of Freud and his analytical approach to psychology.  But he believed there were answers out there that were not physical, that not every emotion stemmed from sexual drive.  In his research he met the beautiful Sabina Spielrein, a troubled woman with strange appetites.  The two became lovers, playing a dangerous game of transference between doctor and patient, ultimately creating a situation that was impossible to keep secret.  As Jung attempted to define his new theories, he could not stop his personal life from impacting his legacy.

Michael Fassbender did not disappoint.  He was excellent as Jung; professional yet troubled, careful yet unpredictable.  The story itself was extremely interesting, if you care at all about the history of psychology.  Seeing these pioneers come to life was pretty cool, and the time period was well represented.  Viggo Mortensen did a find job of playing Freud; I quickly forgot it was Viggo, which is good because he's not always been the best actor.  Keira Knightley was a little off-putting at first, going over the top quickly and only later pulling herself back.  She didn't ruin anything though, and perhaps she meant to go wild and make the audience a little uncomfortable.  The film was uncomfortable at times, but the subject matter was intense and explicit, so that shouldn't come as a surprise.  It was a good film, very interesting, and well done.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Tuesday, 3 September 2013

Movie Review - The Best of Times

Posted on 07:48 by Unknown

Director: Roger Spottiswoode
Starring: Robin Williams, Kurt Russell, Pamela Reed
Year: 1986

A quintessential sports movie starring two actors who were in their prime; sounds like a pretty good set up.  Kurt Russell was a heartthrob at the time, though he hadn't emerged as a "star" yet.  And Robin Williams was done with Mork & Mindy, ready to make the leap to full-time movie actor.  They teamed up in this film, the hunk and the funny guy, and it would go on to become a sports classic, complete with pep talks, Hail Marys, underdogs, and physical comedy.  Sounds alright and I figured it was a must-see.  Well I saw it, and now I kind of wish I hadn't.

The story takes place in the city of Taft, California.  Football has been important there for generations, and no quarterback was ever better than Reno Hightower.  Unfortunately, in the final game of his career his mighty game-winning pass was dropped by bumbling backup wide receiver Jack Dundee.  Reno & Jack are all grown up, still live in Taft, and have never forgotten that fateful day.  In order to make amends with the past and to fix their broken marriages, Reno & Jack stage a rematch with the same team & players that beat them all those years ago.  Reno wants another chance at glory, while Jack just wants to catch the ball this time, defeating the demons that have haunted him ever since he became the guy who dropped the pass.

I tried to appreciate the movie on a sports classic level.  It had all you could ask for and all that has been mocked & copied ever since.  So in a way it deserves some credit.  But other than that it was pretty terrible.  Kurt Russell isn't a good actor, never has been, and he couldn't really pull off the meat-head QB whose real passion is van painting.  And Robin Williams wasn't very funny as the messed up banker who can't live down his failures.  Then the guys try to revitalize the town and things just get awkward.  It wasn't really entertaining, it wasn't heartwarming, and it never really went anywhere.  I felt bored more often that not, and that's coming from a football fan.  All in all, The Best of Times is no Rudy, and doesn't deserve a rewatch.

My rating: ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Thursday, 29 August 2013

Movie Review - Gangster Squad

Posted on 07:56 by Unknown

Director: Ruben Fleischer
Starring: Josh Brolin, Ryan Gosling, Sean Penn, Emma Stone
Year: 2013

I try to steer clear of shoot-em-up movies, because they're normally terrible.  I don't mean Quentin Tarantino films, I meet throw-away action films, stupid Jason Statham movies, and gangster flicks.  The last gangster story I watched was Public Enemies.  Read my review of that one to see how it went.  There's just something fleeting about that era that is hard to capture on film, especially without making it seem cheesy & stupid.  I liked the look of Gangster Squad because it almost had a graphic novel feel to it.  Not that I'm a fan of comic books, but I thought it might be an interesting take on the genre, one that would actually give me what I want; a good movie that happens to take place in a cool time period.  Well, that didn't happen.

So here's the story.  The year is 1949, the city is Los Angeles.  Organized crime has taken over the town under the leadership of East Coast crook Mickey Cohen.  He's a Jew, he's a bad ass, and he's taking the city by force.  The police can't stop him because he's bought all the politicians.  No one will testify against him because that's the same as suicide.  So desperate measures have to be taken.  A secret police squadron is formed, led by the honorable Sergeant O'Mara.  He forms a squad made up of clean cops; a wise acre, a sharp shooter, a street smart, an intelligence expert.  Their mission is to take down Cohen's operation, destroy everything, kill anyone, while leaving their badges at home.  But will they succeed, or will the gangsters win the war?

So it didn't end up having a graphic novel feel.  It didn't end up being cool, having substance, nor was it any good.  It was just another crappy tommy gun movie, in which a million bullets are fired and nothing really happens.  There was a plot; take down Mickey Cohen.  But there wasn't really much of a story, it was more like action happening along the way.  I never cared whether or not they succeeded, and I never saw much that set it apart from The Untouchables, a far superior movie.  And the acting, oh man.  Emma Stone was worthless and horrible.  Josh Brolin was leaden and dull.  Sean Penn was OK, but it was more weird than good.  Ryan Gosling was the only stand out, and he was the only one who wasn't phoning it in.  I just don't like this type of movie, and it's because they're usually so bad.  Someone make a good one, please, it can't be that hard.

My rating: ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Monday, 26 August 2013

Movie Review - Burn After Reading

Posted on 08:17 by Unknown

Director: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
Starring: Frances McDormund, John Malkovich, George Clooney, Brad Pitt
Year: 2008

I'll watch most anything as long as the Coen Brothers are involved, and most likely I'll love it.  Fargo, The Big Lebowski, O Brother; some great films.  Others were just alright: Raising Arizona, Barton Fink, True Grit.  But regardless, this duo makes very interesting and very original films, and Burn After Reading is no exception.  At first it seems like a crime/CIA/covert ops drama, and then the more you watch it the more it feels like a comedy.  By the end you realize that they're mocking a pretty ridiculous genre, using humor to point out what we ought to have been laughing at all these years, yet took so seriously. 

The plot is a mess of who's sleeping with who, who's blackmailing who, and what the hell is going on.  Ex-government employee Osbourne Cox recently quit his job and is on the verge of a divorce.  His wife is sleeping with Harry, another DC insider.  Harry is sleeping with anyone he can find, including the very simple-minded Linda Litzke.  She and her equally dimwitted pal Chad happen upon some "serious secret shit", and decide to blackmail Ozzy Cox or sell the information to the Russians.  They, of course, are in way over there heads.  People are followed, blood is spilled, secrets are revealed, and nothing is easy as the situation spins out of control.

Burn After Reading is one of the best spoofs you'll find.  It pokes perfect fun at the classic FBI intel storyline and the nonsensical plots that always emerge in them.  If you didn't have a sense of humor you might actually believe that this was a serious film, because it sticks to the genre so closely.  But, of course, it's actually a comedy and everything the characters do is designed to mock and amuse.  It's a hilarious movie; Brad Pitt & Frances McDormund are great as the bumbling blockheads who think they can outwit the professionals.  John Malkovich & George Clooney are equally excellent as the paranoid G-men who really have no idea what's going on.  Sometimes the humor goes a little over the top, but it's all meant to show us how utterly insane we must be to believe any story like this for more than a second. 

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Thursday, 22 August 2013

Movie Review - Forbidden World

Posted on 08:08 by Unknown

Director: Allan Holzman
Starring: Jesse Vint, June Chadwick, Dawn Dunlap
Year: 1982

On my tour of 80s fantasy movies, I made a stop over at 80s sci-fi.  It's a pretty good genre, but the only problem is that every film resembles Alien in some way.  It's amazing when you think about it, how important & influential Alien was to every space/alien movie that came after it.  For a minute while watching Forbidden World I thought, "Wow, this was made in the early 80s, Alien must have taken a lot of its ideas from this movie!".  But I guess I forget that Alien was made in 1979.  I'm sure there are other movies that inspired it, but that film remains a highly copied & coveted piece of sci-fi cinema.  So while Forbidden World was a pretty good flick, it owes a lot to those that came before.

The story takes place in the far future on a distant planet.  In a government research facility, very important scientific work is being carried out.  The team there is attempting to create a genetically altered super food to combat the galactic food shortage.  They have succeeded in developing a highly productive mutant gene, but there's just one problem; they can't control it.  As the "thing" changes from one form to the next, no can predict what it will do or how it will try to survive.  When a government agent is called in for support, he finds himself in a confusing fight for survival, as the scientists want to save their long years of work, while he just wants to kill it before it kills all of them.

This film was also called Mutant, which makes much more sense.  There's no forbidden world, but there is an ugly killer mutant who eats everything in its path.  I actually liked this movie, despite its Alien plagiarism.  It was funny, slightly clever, and not horribly acted.  It had a few awesomely bad classic scenes that I'll remember for a while, and I'm a sucker for space plots in small spaces; again, very similar to Alien.  Incidentally, the very first scene of the film reminded me a lot of Prometheus, the Alien prequel that came out in 2012.  But taken on its own, Forbidden World was a fun early sci-fi film that started well, got a little too bloody & screamy by the end, but was entertaining throughout.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Wednesday, 21 August 2013

Movie Review - The Sessions

Posted on 08:11 by Unknown

Director: Ben Lewin
Starring: John Hawkes, Helen Hunt, William H. Macy
Year: 2012

For a movie that got a lot of Oscar buzz last year, it sure didn't get a lot of Oscar credit.  Helen Hunt was nominated for Best Supporting Actress, and that's about it.  No Best Picture, Best Director, or Best Actor for John Hawkes.  Everything seemed to be there for this movie to be a big award winner; true story, very difficult lead role, an actress outside her comfort zone.  But neither audiences nor critics really got on board.  It seemed like this racy movie really didn't do much more than simply entertain, and after watching it I can say that that is pretty much exactly right.

The story of the film is based on an actual article by Mark O'Brien about his experience with a sex surrogate.  Mark had polio when he was young and is confined to a gurney and an iron lung.  He is a journalist and a poet, and when he begins to write a story about sex in the handicapped world, it opens his eyes to his own lack of sexual experience.  He decides to have sex at least once before his imminent death, and he hires a surrogate to make it happen.  Cheryl isn't a prostitute, she is a therapist, attempting to open up Mark's sexual being within six intense sessions.  As he battles with his Catholic guilt over sexuality, he must also fight his uncontrollable body, trying his best to find love and pleasure in a very unlikely place.

As you can probably gleam from the summary, the central theme to this movie is sex.  Helen Hunt is naked throughout, there are some very explicit discussions, and the characters discuss sexuality alongside morality, religion, and nature.  That said, the film is also about love and attempting to feel normal when your life is anything but.  As far as that goes, the actors do a great job telling this true story.  It's very interesting and engaging, having a fast pace and good detail.  But, and here's the catch, it's nothing special.  I was expecting a little more, something deeper, less Hollywood.  But it turned out to be a regular movie about a sexual topic.  William H. Macy was a little cheesy, Helen Hunt did a weird Boston accent, and John Hawkes spouted too much poetry.  Everything was just OK and not as ground-breaking as I had hoped it would be.  I can see why it got more buzz than awards, as it just didn't go that extra mile to become atypical.  The Sessions was good, but sadly not great.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Tuesday, 20 August 2013

Movie Review - The Master

Posted on 08:50 by Unknown

Director: Paul Thomas Anderson
Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams
Year: 2012

Paul Thomas Anderson is probably my favorite director other than Wes Anderson, their last names being just a coincidence.  The Coen Brothers, Christopher Guest, Woody Allen, those guys are right up there, but PTA just makes near perfect movies that are unlike anything you've ever seen before.  His first film was Hard Eight, which is the only one I've not seen.  His others, in order, are Boogie Nights, Magnolia, Punch-Drunk Love, There Will Be Blood, and The Master.  Those are some of the best movies ever made, in my humble opinion, and I had high hopes for his latest project.  Especially since Philip Seymour Hoffman is also one of my favorite actors, with Joaquin Phoenix and Amy Adams high on my respected actors list.  I must have a thing for non-assassins with three names.  Anyway, I was primed to love The Master.

The main character isn't the master, but the student, a young man named Freddie.  He is an ex-sailor, a vagrant, a law-breaker, a drunk, a murderer, someone who has no direction and no reason to dream.  But his future begins to take shape when he meets Lancaster Dodd, the man everyone calls Master.  He is the teacher of a new outlook on life, a new philosophy that teaches his followers how to revisit their past lives and experiences, and to use them to make themselves happier people.  Many call this unique group a cult, but for Freddie it fills a hole inside him that he's had for his entire life.  Freddie gives himself to the cause, to bettering himself, and to a special relationship that begins to form between himself and the Master.  But his old life and his old wandering ways have never quite disappeared, leaving him torn between self improvement and self destruction.

At first I was a little concerned.  It was beautiful and dramatic from the very beginning, but it actually felt more like a Terrence Malick film (The Thin Red Line, The New World, The Tree of Life) than a PTA film, and that's not good.  I hate the way the Malick's movies are so self indulgent, so purposelessly pretty.  And that's the way The Master felt at first, but luckily that didn't last long.  When Freddie (Phoenix) met Master (Hoffman) everything changed.  The fast-paced, music-driven dialogue started humming, the scenes became crisp and unsettling, and the movie started to feel the way I imagined it would.  The acting in this movie is some of the best you are ever going to see.  Not for one second did I think of them as actors.  Well, maybe Amy Adams, but that's not really her fault.  She was strong too, just not as perfect as the two main characters.  And the film itself wasn't exactly perfect either.  It lacked the strange humor of Boogie Nights, Punch-Drunk Love, and even There Will Be Blood that relieved some of the pressure off of the intensity of the story.  Magnolia was like that, excellent but maybe a little too heavy.  The Master was the same; a great movie with amazing acting that could have used something to take the edge off of what became a very deep and dark story.  This film isn't for everyone, but it's one that I'm still going over in my head and would watch again.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Monday, 19 August 2013

Movie Review - Zack and Miri Make a Porno

Posted on 08:00 by Unknown

Director: Kevin Smith
Starring: Seth Rogen, Elizabeth Banks, Craig Robinson
Year: 2008

I was fourteen when Chasing Amy came out, and at the time that was about as adult a movie as I had ever seen.  It was about sex, relationships, friendships, they swore continually, and I felt grown up when I watched it.  It was perfection then and it's still a great movie, but I'm wondering if I actually grew up too much to enjoy Kevin Smith's style and humor.  Clerks, Mallrats, Dogma, Jay and Silent Bob; those used to be some of my favorite movies, but I wouldn't say that any longer.  Maybe I matured past those movies, and maybe Kevin Smith needs to as well.  He did with Red State, a psychotic and original film that I really enjoyed.  But I can't say the same about Zack and Miri, a movie that's funny, vulgar, and juvenile but one that I might have only enjoyed when I was a teenager.

Zack is basically a loser.  He doesn't have a girlfriend, he works at a coffee shop, he lives in a dump with his best friend Miri, can't pay any of his bills, and is one step away from living on the street.  He's about to give up hope, when he stumbles upon what he thinks is a fantastic idea; making a porno!  Zack and Miri team up to create a horribly low-budget porn filled with bizarre people and strange fetishes.  The climax of the movie is supposed to be the two best friends' first time together, but as the moment approaches feelings start to get in the way.  Can the fake film survive what might turn out to be real emotion?

I'm torn, because I respect Kevin Smith and used to find this stuff really funny, but I guess I just don't as much anymore.  It was silly, gross, raunchy, offensive, but not always in bad ways.  It was often amusing, quite surprising, so I can't say I didn't like it.  And I still enjoy crass humor in movies, like This Is the End, but for some reason this certain style has just lost its attraction to me.  I'm sure the acting in the movie didn't help.  Seth Rogen was funny, but wow was Elizabeth Banks horrible.  And so was Craig Robinson, just awful.  There were some nice cameos: Jason Mewes (minus Silent Bob), Jeff Anderson (from Clerks).  But the film as a whole just didn't work.  I was confused more that amused, and at the end my friend said it best when he said, "Well that was special."  I can't say I hated it, but I definitely wouldn't watch it ever again. 

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Saturday, 17 August 2013

Movie Review - Flight

Posted on 11:37 by Unknown

Director: Robert Zemeckis
Starring: Denzel Washington, Kelly Reilly, Don Cheadle
Year: 2012

Denzel Washington is one of the best actors of our time.  I know this isn't breaking news, but it doesn't hurt to say it again.  He has the ability to enter into any role, develop a deeper character than you ever saw coming, and then turn around to do it three times every year.  But therein also lies the problem; he does so many movies that some are bound to be awful.  John Q, Unstoppable, Deja Vu; he might not be bad in them but they had almost no chance of being good movies.  And of course on the flip side you have some of the best films ever made: Training Day, Crimson Tide, Glory.  My point is that you might watch a movie because Denzel is in it, he has that star power, but you never know exactly what you're going to get.  With Flight I was pretty sure I knew greatness was coming.

In this film, Denzel plays Whip Whitaker, an excellent pilot, but also a colossal drunk.  He drinks, he smokes, he gets high, he gets low, whatever.  And the night before, the morning of, and during his most recent flight he is pretty wasted.  He's been living with it long enough to not let his drugs affect his flying, but when disaster strikes his airplane and it crashes, his lifestyle comes under scrutiny.  He may have been the only pilot who could have performed the miraculous maneuver that saved the lives of most of the souls on board that day, but being intoxicated is against the law, and when his toxicology report shows the chemicals in his system he faces life in prison.  And while Whip might be able to beat the rap, he can't seem to beat his addiction to alcohol, hero or not.

It seems like a trend of the movies I've been watching, but once again a movie starts out amazing and finishes so so.  With Washington and Zemeckis on board for Flight, I knew it would be high quality, and it was.  The beginning was great, the music was awesome throughout, and Whip was an extremely interesting and deep character.  The problem came when the movie became about addiction.  I've just seen too many.  I wasn't looking for another AA session, another sob story, another "religion fills the hole in your life" film.  And while at first I thought the film was poking some fun at these things, it ended up being about these things, and that's not what I wanted.  I wanted Denzel to be amazing, which he was.  I wanted the side characters to be strong, which they were.  But I wanted the end to be original, and it just wasn't.  I was left feeling a little disappointed, since it all started so well and finished a little limply.  Flight turned out to be a good movie, but not as perfect as I had imagined it would be.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Friday, 16 August 2013

Movie Review - Looper

Posted on 07:42 by Unknown

Director: Rian Johnson
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Bruce Willis, Emily Blunt
Year: 2012

This was one of those movies that I knew I had to see as soon as I watched the trailer.  Not only am I a sucker for dystopian futures, but I also love time travel and Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  And what he was attempting to do in this movie was pretty ambitious.  JGL would become Bruce Willis, as they played the same character from different times.  He would morph into this other man, and that was something I wanted to see.  And Looper also seemed to have an Inception vibe to it, which I loved, and I was looking forward to seeing another twisted take on a cool sci-fi premise.  So here I am just shy of a year after the movie came out, finally seeing it.  The first half of the movie delivered everything I was hoping for; a great story, good action, it forced me to think.  But then the second half started, and I wasn't as pleased.

The year is 2044, and crime has become law.  Mob bosses rule the cities and their employees hand out the justice.  One career of the future is that of Looper, a very strange occupation.  Apparently in the 2070s time travel will be invented.  It will be immediately outlawed, but the crime organizations will use it at will.  What they do with it is pretty ingenious; anyone they want dead they send back in time, back to 2044, where a Looper is being paid to kill the mark, dispose of the body, and wake up to do it all again the next day.  At some point every Looper will be sent his own self to kill, which is called 'closing the loop'.  You close your loop, get a huge pay day, go have fun for thirty years, and prepare for your imminent death.  All this is fine with Joe, until the day his own loop is sent to him, escapes, and turns his whole world upside down.  Now he must find himself, kill himself, and figure out what the hell is going on.

What an awesome story.  The whole idea of Loopers is just so cool, and the way they are portrayed in the movie really makes you want to be one, despite the guarantee of death at an early age.  JGL was the perfect Looper; young, cocky, handsome, but insecure.  And the way they made him look like Bruce Willis was phenomenal.  The makeup was good, but what's impressive is how much he must have studied Willis, because he talked and acted just like him.  So when his future self came back, the scenes between the two of them were eerily awesome.  However, that's kind of when the problems started.  The beginning of the film was so excellent I didn't want it to change.  But when Bruce Willis came the story started getting muddled and the acting talent was definitely lowered.  Not that Willis is terrible, but he wasn't good in this one.  And the plot quickly lost its originality, adding in a love interest, a kid, cheesy heroism, extra sci-fi elements.  They just weren't needed, the base story was strong enough on its own without forcing in some Hollywood.  The first half was great, the second half was just OK, so I'm left a little torn.  At the very least, Looper is a movie worth watching if you like sci-fi/action/time travel movies.  It's just not as wonderful as I had hoped.

My rating: ✰ ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments

Thursday, 15 August 2013

Movie Review - Barbarian Queen

Posted on 08:36 by Unknown

Director: Hector Olivera
Starring: Lana Clarkson, Armando Capo, Dawn Dunlap
Year: 1985

I might have a new favorite genre.  These 80s fantasy movies are just so awesome.  So bad, but so awesome.  They are extremely short, the stories are simple, the action is funny, the actors are eye candy, and it takes zero effort on the part of the viewer.  I'm not usually one for watching movies or TV shows in order to "veg out", I like to be challenged in some way.  But with this genre I can see the benefit of just watching them to waste an hour in a semi-enjoyable way.  Now, that's not to say that every single one of these action-adventure flicks are the same quality; some are an entertaining romp and some are big dull duds.  But regardless, I never really feel cheated, tricked, or annoyed when I watch one of these movies, good or bad.  I always have a fun time, get to laugh at some extremely silly scenes, and turn it off happy.

Barbarian Queen is yet another 80s fantasy epic based around the idea that everyone in ancient times fought with very little clothing on.  In a tiny village in the countryside of a mighty Empire, a prince and princess are about to be married;  Amethea, the beautiful maiden, and Argan, the heroic warrior.  But their nuptials are cut short when their village is attacked, their people slaughtered, and many dragged away to become slaves.  Amethea survives, and along with a small party of women warriors tracks the killers with the goal of freeing her people.  When she meets up with the Rebels, she realizes that her's is not the only tragic story, and that the people of the realm are ready to rise up and defeat the evil Empire.

This movie was almost an exact copy of Deathstalker, with a little less magic and a few more Amazonian heroines.  It was really just a girl version of the earlier film, complete with harems, drunken revelries, evil overlords, castle courtyards, and freedom fighters.  The only problem was it wasn't as funny.  It was a bit more realistic maybe, though I use that word lightly, and it didn't have enough creatures or fantasy.  It needed that fantastic element in order to make it a little lighter and easier to laugh at, since it obviously wasn't made to be an Oscar winner.  But I had a good time watching it, even though I knew it was bad.  It wasn't quite the stellar b-movie I had hoped for, so I can't recommend it over others of its genre, but it was a pretty good example of 80s fantasy fluff.

My rating: ✰ ✰
Read More
Posted in Movie Review | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Movie Review - The Red Violin
    Director: Francois Girard Starring: Carlo Cecchi , Jean-Luc Bideau , Samuel L. Jackson Year: 1998 For some reason I thought this was a Samue...
  • Movie Review - Barbarian Queen
    Director: Hector Olivera Starring: Lana Clarkson , Armando Capo , Dawn Dunlap Year: 1985 I might have a new favorite genre.  These 80s fanta...
  • Movie Review - Fantastic Mr. Fox
    Director: Wes Anderson Starring: George Clooney , Jason Schwartzman , Meryl Streep , Bill Murray Year: 2009 As you might have guessed from t...
  • Book Review - Stuart Little
    Author: E.B. White Year: 1945 I had never read Stuart Little in school like many kids do, I missed that tradition for some reason.  I have,...
  • Movie Review - Forbidden World
    Director: Allan Holzman Starring: Jesse Vint , June Chadwick , Dawn Dunlap Year: 1982 On my tour of 80s fantasy movies, I made a stop over a...
  • Movie Review - Rango
    Director: Gore Verbinski Starring: Johnny Depp , Isla Fisher , Abigail Breslin Year: 2011 Rango was the winner of You Vote, I Review this w...
  • Sports - Fantasy Advice
    A little fantasy advice brought to you by FanDuel.com Late Round Running Back Fantasy Sleepers To Focus On In 2013-2014 The NFL season is...
  • DVD Review - Knuckleball!
    Director: Ricki Stern , Anne Sundberg Starring: Tim Wakefield , R.A. Dickey Year: 2012 First off, what is a knuckleball?  Spellcheck won...
  • Movie Trailer - Free Birds
    Director: Jimmy Hayward Starring: Owen Wilson , Woody Harrelson , Amy Poehler Release: November 1st, 2013 Well turkeys may be dumb but so ar...
  • Movie Trailer - 47 Ronin
    Director: Carl Rinsh Starring: Keanu Reeves , Hiroyuki Sanada , Ko Shibasaki Release: December 25th, 2013 Call me a skeptic, but I have doub...

Categories

  • Book Review
  • DVD Review
  • Movie Review
  • Movie Trailer
  • Sports
  • Thought
  • Trailer

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (353)
    • ▼  September (33)
      • Movie Review - Lee Daniels' The Butler
      • Movie Trailer - Grudge Match
      • Sports - 2013 NFL Picks, Week 3
      • Movie Trailer - Nebraska
      • Movie Review - To Rome with Love
      • Movie Trailer - Escape from Tomorrow
      • Movie Review - Inglourious Basterds
      • Movie Trailer - The Past
      • Movie Review - Into the White
      • Movie Trailer - Best Man Down
      • Movie Review - We're the Millers
      • Movie Trailer - Kill Your Darlings
      • Movie Review - Piranha
      • Movie Trailer - Morning
      • Sports - 2013 NFL Picks, Week 2
      • Movie Trailer - We Are What We Are
      • Thought - 9/11
      • Movie Trailer - All Is Lost
      • Thought - Oscar Predictions
      • Movie Trailer - All Is Bright
      • Movie Review - Ip Man
      • Movie Review - Atlantis: The Lost Empire
      • Movie Review - Mulan
      • Movie Trailer - RoboCop
      • Book Review - The Talisman
      • Movie Trailer - The Young and Prodigious T.S. Spivet
      • Sports - 2013 NFL Picks, Week 1
      • Movie Trailer - The Fifth Estate
      • Movie Review - A Dangerous Method
      • Movie Trailer - August: Osage County
      • Movie Review - The Best of Times
      • Sports - Fantasy Advice
      • Sports - Pater Familias
    • ►  August (54)
    • ►  July (49)
    • ►  June (41)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (38)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2012 (80)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (23)
    • ►  October (28)
    • ►  September (8)
  • ►  2011 (58)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile